Back to Projects

Ergonomic Redesign of Hydrogen Peroxide Tank Replacement System

A group project at the University of Bologna focused on eliminating ergonomic hazards in industrial food packaging operations through digital human simulation and virtual prototyping.

A.A. 2024 / 2025 University of Bologna Virtual Prototyping Lab Team of 5

Simulation Tool — Siemens Jack

Tecnomatix Jack · Siemens

Jack is Siemens' industry-leading digital human simulation software, part of the Tecnomatix suite. It creates biomechanically accurate 3D human models to evaluate ergonomic risk before any physical prototype is built.

In this project, Jack was used to simulate operator postures and movements during tank replacement, then quantify the ergonomic risk using standardized industrial assessment methods.

RULA
Upper limb postural risk scoring
NIOSH Lifting
Recommended weight limit calculation
Lower Back Analysis
Spinal compression force at L4/L5
Static Strength Prediction
Percentage of population capable of task

Overview

A high-speed industrial filling machine used in food packaging for products like milk, juice, and wine. To sterilize the packaging material, the machine uses a hydrogen peroxide bath — a process that requires operators to regularly replace 25 kg tanks of 35% H₂O₂.

This replacement task is performed during active production runs, under time pressure, inside a tight workspace. The manual handling of heavy tanks led to significant ergonomic risks: awkward postures, overhead lifting, and repeated bending.

Our team was tasked with analyzing the current operation and proposing validated ergonomic improvements through virtual prototyping and digital human simulation.

Project Goals

Lid Comparison

Evaluate and compare two lid designs for the peroxide refilling tank using biomechanical analysis.

Ergonomic Solutions

Design tools and systems that reduce operator strain during the tank replacement procedure.

Design Constraints

All solutions must fit within the limited space around the machine and maintain the existing tank-lid interface.

Operational Context

Environment

Industrial food packaging line. Continuous operation with minimal permitted downtime.

Target Users

Operators handling 25 kg tanks regularly, wearing mandatory PPE, under strict hygiene protocols.

Key Challenges

Tight workspace, heavy load precision placement, and critical ergonomic postures including chest-level holding and forward bending.

Virtual Prototyping

The team developed full CAD models of all relevant components and support tools using virtual prototyping methodologies. These included the hydrogen peroxide tank, two lid variants (old and new), and proposed ergonomic aids.

CAD Components

Hydrogen peroxide tank, old lid, new lid, cap — all modeled for simulation and analysis.

Manual Trolley

Custom-designed support trolley to transport and position the tank without direct lifting.

Mechanical Lift

Elevator mechanism to bring the tank to the correct ergonomic height before insertion.

Proposed Solutions

Solution 1 — Ergonomic Trolley System

  • Operator loads the filled tank onto a custom trolley
  • Trolley transports the tank to the machine without carrying
  • Tank slides into the slot without any lifting or bending
  • Eliminates back and arm strain caused by manual handling

Solution 2 — Elevator Lift System

  • Mechanical lift raises the tank to the correct ergonomic height
  • Operator pushes trolley to the conveyor area
  • Tank is tilted and transferred by sliding, not lifting
  • Eliminates overhead lifting entirely

Redesigned Task Flow

1

Load the filled tank onto the custom ergonomic trolley

2

Use the trolley to transport the tank to the machine

3

Position the trolley directly in front of the machine slot

4

Slide the tank into position — no lifting required

Ergonomic Analysis Results

Digital human simulation assessed both the current (AS-IS) and redesigned (TO-BE) workflows. Results show significant improvement across all ergonomic metrics after implementing the trolley solution.

RULA — Rapid Upper Limb Assessment

AS-IS (Original Posture)
RULA original
TO-BE (With Trolley)
RULA with trolley

Lower Back Analysis

AS-IS (With Load)
Lower back with load
TO-BE (With Trolley)
Lower back with trolley

Static Strength & Force Analysis

Static Strength Prediction (Trolley)
Static strength
Force Solver Analysis
Force solver

Lid Design Comparison

A secondary case study compared the original lid against a newly designed alternative. The new lid was lighter in mass and demonstrated improved scores across RULA, NIOSH, and Lower Back analysis — reducing operator load during the attachment and detachment procedure.

Mass Reduction

New lid design is significantly lighter, directly reducing the effort required during tank connection.

Improved RULA Score

New lid scored lower on the RULA assessment, indicating reduced upper limb postural risk.

Lower Back Load

Biomechanical analysis confirmed reduced spinal compression forces with the new lid design.

Team

This project was completed as part of the Design and Virtual Prototyping of Automatic Machines Laboratory at the University of Bologna — a team of 5 mechanical engineering students.